Hobley v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., 18-cv-1307. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20181011c50
Visitors: 18
Filed: Oct. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER MARK L. HORNSBY , Magistrate Judge . Calvin Hobley was killed in an accident at a KCS railroad crossing. Hobley's surviving wife and children ("Plaintiffs") filed suit in state court against KCS and the Louisiana DOTD. KCS has removed the case based on an assertion of diversity jurisdiction. It acknowledges that Plaintiffs and the DOTD share Louisiana citizenship but argues the citizenship of the DOTD should be ignored pursuant to the improper joinder doctrine, which is out
Summary: MEMORANDUM ORDER MARK L. HORNSBY , Magistrate Judge . Calvin Hobley was killed in an accident at a KCS railroad crossing. Hobley's surviving wife and children ("Plaintiffs") filed suit in state court against KCS and the Louisiana DOTD. KCS has removed the case based on an assertion of diversity jurisdiction. It acknowledges that Plaintiffs and the DOTD share Louisiana citizenship but argues the citizenship of the DOTD should be ignored pursuant to the improper joinder doctrine, which is outl..
More
MEMORANDUM ORDER
MARK L. HORNSBY, Magistrate Judge.
Calvin Hobley was killed in an accident at a KCS railroad crossing. Hobley's surviving wife and children ("Plaintiffs") filed suit in state court against KCS and the Louisiana DOTD. KCS has removed the case based on an assertion of diversity jurisdiction. It acknowledges that Plaintiffs and the DOTD share Louisiana citizenship but argues the citizenship of the DOTD should be ignored pursuant to the improper joinder doctrine, which is outlined in Smallwood v. Illinois Central RR Co., 385 F.3d 568 (5th Cir. 2004). The court is obligated to determine subject matter jurisdiction, including whether a party is improperly joined, either through a motion challenge or on its own initiative. Gasch v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 491 F.3rd 278, 281 (5th Cir. 2007).
If Plaintiffs contest the assertion that the DOTD was improperly joined, they must file a motion to remand, supported by a memorandum, by November 9, 2018 and explain why there is a reasonable basis to predict that state law would allow Plaintiffs to recover against the DOTD. If Plaintiffs timely file a motion to remand, it will be noticed for briefing so that KCS can respond and attempt to meet its burden on the improper joinder issue. If Plaintiffs do not timely file a motion to remand and challenge the improper joinder plea, the court will consider Plaintiffs to concede the point, the DOTD will be dismissed, and the court will set a scheduling conference to discuss a trial date and related deadlines.
Source: Leagle