MEMORANDUM ORDER

MARK L. HORNSBY, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff filed this suit in state court for damages arising out of an auto accident. Defendants removed the case to federal court on a basis of diversity jurisdiction, which puts the burden on the removing party to allege facts showing complete diversity of citizenship of the parties and an amount in controversy over $75,000.

The notice of removal alleges that defendant Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company is organized under the laws of the State of Texas and has its principal place of business in Texas. Defendant also alleges that Plaintiff made a pre-suit demand totaling $174,522.38. These facts are sufficient with respect to the citizenship of Progressive County and the amount in controversy.

The notice of removal states that Plaintiff is a resident of Louisiana and that defendants Michael G. Herigon and Susan A. Miller are residents of Texas. It is domicile rather than mere residency that decides citizenship for diversity purposes, and "[i]t is well established that an allegation of residency does not satisfy the requirement of an allegation of citizenship." Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley, 313 F.3d 305, 310 n. 2 (5th Cir. 2002), quoting Strain v. Harrelson Rubber Co., 742 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1984). A person may reside in multiple states simultaneously, but "[a]n individual who resides in more than one State is regarded, for purposes of federal subject-matter (diversity) jurisdiction, as a citizen of but one State." Wachovia Bank v. Schmidt, 126 S.Ct. 941, 951 (2006). That is the state in which the person is domiciled. Id.; Acridge v. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Soc., 334 F.3d 444, 451 (5th Cir. 2003).

Accordingly, Defendants need to amend their notice of removal to allege the domicile of Plaintiff and defendants Michael G. Herigon and Susan A. Miller. Defendants must file their amended notice of removal by March 25, 2019.