Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fridge v. City of Marksville, Civil Action 1:15-CV-01998. (2019)

Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20190429g29 Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 25, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT DEE D. DRELL , District Judge . For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Fridge's official capacity 1983 claims against Chief Smith (Doc. 39) is GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to dismiss Fridge's 1983 claims against the City (D
More

JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Fridge's official capacity § 1983 claims against Chief Smith (Doc. 39) is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to dismiss Fridge's § 1983 claims against the City (Doc. 39) is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Fridge's § 1983 claims against Chief Smith in his individual capacity for unconstitutional policies or customs (Doc. 39) is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Fridge's § 1983 claims against Chief Smith in his individual capacity for failure to train or supervise (Doc. 39) is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Fridge's state law failure-to-train claim against Chief Smith and the City (Doc. 39) is GRANTED.

IT IS ORDERED that Fridge's Second Amendment and procedural due process claims for retention of his firearm are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Dismiss Fridge's state law claims against Defendants Stafford, Greenhouse, Montgomery, Damion Jacobs, Hill, and Eric Jacobs (Doc. 39) is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Fridge's bystander claims (Doc. 39) is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's request for a stay of discovery (Doc. 39) is DENIED.

IT IS ORDERED that Fridge's request to amend his complaint (Doc. 45) is DENIED.

The claims and Defendants that remain are: (1) Fridge's state law claims for respondeat superior liability against Chief Smith and the City; and (2) Fridge's § 1983 and state law claims against Defendants Stafford, Greenhouse, Montgomery, Damion Jacobs, Hill, and Eric Jacobs.

THUS ORDERED AND SIGNED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer