Filed: May 09, 2019
Latest Update: May 09, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT MICHAEL J. JUNEAU , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for a Report and Recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and considering the objections filed, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. The Court specifically notes that under Louisiana law, adopting the Report and Recommendation and dismissing Dan
Summary: JUDGMENT MICHAEL J. JUNEAU , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for a Report and Recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and considering the objections filed, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. The Court specifically notes that under Louisiana law, adopting the Report and Recommendation and dismissing DanC..
More
JUDGMENT
MICHAEL J. JUNEAU, District Judge.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for a Report and Recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and considering the objections filed, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. The Court specifically notes that under Louisiana law, adopting the Report and Recommendation and dismissing DanChem Technologies, Inc. with prejudice will not bar any remaining party from presenting evidence at trial as to the comparative fault of DanChem Technologies, Inc.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss Third Party Complaint [Rec. Doc. 26], which was filed by Third Party Defendant, DanChem Technologies, Inc., is hereby GRANTED and AmeriGlobe, LLC's claims against DanChem Technologies, Inc. are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that any party may present evidence at trial of the comparative fault of DanChem Technologies, Inc.
