Frazier v. City of Kaplan, 6:19-CV-00082. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20190614930
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jun. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and after consideration of objections filed, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation [Doc. No. 34] is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Regardi
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and after consideration of objections filed, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation [Doc. No. 34] is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Regardin..
More
JUDGMENT
TERRY A. DOUGHTY, District Judge.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and after consideration of objections filed, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation [Doc. No. 34] is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Regarding Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint (Rec. Doc. 25) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's § 1983 claims for false arrest/imprisonment, all Fourth, Fifth, Fourteenth, Monell, and federal law claims for malicious prosecution are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, consistent with the report and recommendation. Plaintiff's state law claims for malicious prosecution are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to his right to pursue those in State court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining motions [Doc. Nos. 6, 18 & 22] are DENIED AS MOOT.
Source: Leagle
