Plaisance v. U.S. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 6:18-cv-00033. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20190626b46
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to t..
More
JUDGMENT
ROBERT G. JAMES, District Judge.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)1 with instructions that the claimant's applications for Disability Insurance Benefits and Supplemental Security Income be granted and for computation and payment of an award of benefits beginning on April 21, 2009.
FootNotes
1. A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5th Cir. 1993).
Source: Leagle
