Silas v. U.S. Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 6:18-cv-00121. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20190626b47
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to t..
More
JUDGMENT
ROBERT G. JAMES, District Judge.
This matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Hanna for report and recommendation. After an independent review of the record, and noting the absence of any objections, this Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED and REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).1 More particularly, the Commissioner is instructed to reconsider whether the claimant experienced medical improvement and to explain the evidence that supports medical improvement, if any, on any particular date, and to reevaluate the claimant's residual functional capacity. The claimant shall be afforded the opportunity to submit updated medical evidence and to testify at another hearing.
FootNotes
1. A fourth sentence remand constitutes a final judgment that triggers the filing period for an EAJA fee application. Shalala v. Schaeffer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Freeman v. Shalala, 2 F.3d 552, 553 (5th Cir. 1993).
Source: Leagle
