Filed: Jul. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [doc. # 49] filed by defendant, the Winn Parish Police Jury, is GRANTED, and that plaintiff's claims agains
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [doc. # 49] filed by defendant, the Winn Parish Police Jury, is GRANTED, and that plaintiff's claims against..
More
JUDGMENT
TERRY A. DOUGHTY, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the motion for summary judgment [doc. # 49] filed by defendant, the Winn Parish Police Jury, is GRANTED, and that plaintiff's claims against said defendant are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, in their entirety.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment [doc. # 59] filed by defendant, Cranford Jordan, is hereby GRANTED-IN-PART, and that plaintiff's state law claim under Article I, § 12 of the Louisiana Constitution, plus all of his federal law claims against said defendant, in his individual and official capacities, including, but not necessarily limited to, his claims for inadequate/delayed medical care, conditions of confinement (including denial of access to courts), supervisory liability, failure to train, and Monell liability are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment [doc. # 64] filed by defendants, Andy Brown and LaSalle Corrections, is GRANTED-IN-PART and that plaintiff's claims against LaSalle Corrections are DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, in their entirety, and that plaintiff's state law claim under Article I, § 12 of the Louisiana Constitution, plus all of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against Andy Brown, in his individual and official capacities, including, but not necessarily limited to, his claims for inadequate/delayed medical care, conditions of confinement (including denial of access to courts), supervisory liability, failure to train, and Monell liability are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for summary judgment [doc. # 59 & 64] otherwise are DENIED, i.e., as to plaintiff's state law tort claims against both Sheriffs Jordan and Brown, in their official capacities, and as to his claims under the ADA and Article I, § 12 of the Louisiana Constitution against Sheriff Brown, in his official capacity.
