BILLY H. EZELL, JUDGE.
On June 28, 2011, Defendant, George Morgan, Sr., was convicted of aggravated assault, in violation of La.R.S. 14:37. On the same date, the sentencing court ordered Defendant to pay $300.00 or serve ninety days in jail, imposed a ninety-day jail sentence, suspended the ninety-day sentence, and placed Defendant on one year of unsupervised probation with special conditions.
On July 13, 2011, Defendant filed a pro se motion for appeal, and the district court granted the appeal. Thereafter, an appeal record was lodged with this court. In response, this court, on August 17, 2011, issued a rule to show cause ordering Defendant to file a brief on or before August 25, 2011, why the appeal should not be dismissed as it is a non-appealable judgment. This court received no response.
Under La.Code Crim.P. arts. 912-912.1, Defendant does not have the right to appeal a criminal conviction that was not triable by jury. Aggravated assault is a misdemeanor. La.R.S. 14:2; La.R.S. 14:37. Under La.Code Crim.P. art. 779, misdemeanors are only triable by jury if the penalty for the offense "may be a fine in excess of one thousand dollars or imprisonment for more than six months." The potential penalties for Defendant's conviction for aggravated assault under La.R.S. 14:37 included a fine of "not more than one thousand dollars," or imprisonment "for not more than six months, or both." Thus, as Defendant's conviction and sentence are not appealable, his appeal is hereby dismissed.
However, under La.Code Crim.P. art. 912.1(C), Defendant "has the right of judicial review by application to the court of appeal for a writ of review." Defendant is permitted to file an application for supervisory writs, in compliance with Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 4, no later than thirty days from the date of this decision. Defendant is not required to file a notice of intent to seek supervisory review nor obtain an order setting a return date pursuant to Uniform Rules—Courts of Appeal, Rule 4-3 as Defendant's motion and order for appeal are hereby construed as such.