ANGIODYNAMICS, INC. v. BIOLITEC, INC., 3:12-cv-30207 (MAP). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20130225d44
Filed: Dec. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT IN THIS ACTION MICHAEL A. PONSOR, District Judge. AngioDynamics, Inc. ("AngioDynamics") and Biolitec, Inc. ("Biolitec") have agreed to the following judgment in the above-captioned case in favor of AngioDynamics (the "MA Domesticated Judgment"): "Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $23,156,287.00 plus post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.18% per annum from November 8, 2012, the date of the judgment in AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Bio
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT IN THIS ACTION MICHAEL A. PONSOR, District Judge. AngioDynamics, Inc. ("AngioDynamics") and Biolitec, Inc. ("Biolitec") have agreed to the following judgment in the above-captioned case in favor of AngioDynamics (the "MA Domesticated Judgment"): "Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $23,156,287.00 plus post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.18% per annum from November 8, 2012, the date of the judgment in AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biol..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT IN THIS ACTION
MICHAEL A. PONSOR, District Judge.
AngioDynamics, Inc. ("AngioDynamics") and Biolitec, Inc. ("Biolitec") have agreed to the following judgment in the above-captioned case in favor of AngioDynamics (the "MA Domesticated Judgment"):
"Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $23,156,287.00 plus post-judgment interest at the rate of 0.18% per annum from November 8, 2012, the date of the judgment in AngioDynamics, Inc. v. Biolitec, Inc., 08-cv-0004 (N.D.N.Y.) upon which this Judgment is based, and without costs."
AngioDynamics agrees that it will not take any steps to enforce the MA Domesticated Judgment prior to January 21, 2013. This agreement shall not limit the ability of AngioDynamics to take steps to enforce any judgment entered against the defendant in any other jurisdiction outside of Massachusetts nor shall it preclude Biolitec, Inc. from seeking a Stay of Enforcement of the MA Domesticated Judgment from the District Court, that right being expressly reserved.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
