CHERDAK v. KOKO FITCLUB, LLC, 14-cv-10371-IT. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20150604b24
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2015
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . After reviewing the April 27, 2015 Memorandum of Decision and Order on Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order [#157] of Magistrate Judge Dein, the Protective Order [#158] issued by Magistrate Judge Dein, and Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Orders [#161], the court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), finds that no part of the above-referenced orders by Magistrate Judge Dein are clearly erroneous or contrary to
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . After reviewing the April 27, 2015 Memorandum of Decision and Order on Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order [#157] of Magistrate Judge Dein, the Protective Order [#158] issued by Magistrate Judge Dein, and Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Orders [#161], the court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), finds that no part of the above-referenced orders by Magistrate Judge Dein are clearly erroneous or contrary to l..
More
ORDER
INDIRA TALWANI, District Judge.
After reviewing the April 27, 2015 Memorandum of Decision and Order on Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order [#157] of Magistrate Judge Dein, the Protective Order [#158] issued by Magistrate Judge Dein, and Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Orders [#161], the court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), finds that no part of the above-referenced orders by Magistrate Judge Dein are clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Accordingly, the court affirms these orders.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
