GUARRIELLO v. FAMILY ENDOWMENT PARTNERS, LP, 14-cv-13351-IT. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20150814924
Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2015
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . Before the court is defendants' Motion for Clarification [#55]. The August 12, 2015 Order [#54] rejected defendants' objection to the third-party's production of documents responsive to plaintiffs' subpoena. The court also ordered defendants themselves to produce documents in response to plaintiffs' Request for Production of Documents, subject to the objections and privileges asserted in their March 16, 2015 response. The court has not yet addressed
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . Before the court is defendants' Motion for Clarification [#55]. The August 12, 2015 Order [#54] rejected defendants' objection to the third-party's production of documents responsive to plaintiffs' subpoena. The court also ordered defendants themselves to produce documents in response to plaintiffs' Request for Production of Documents, subject to the objections and privileges asserted in their March 16, 2015 response. The court has not yet addressed ..
More
ORDER
INDIRA TALWANI, District Judge.
Before the court is defendants' Motion for Clarification [#55]. The August 12, 2015 Order [#54] rejected defendants' objection to the third-party's production of documents responsive to plaintiffs' subpoena. The court also ordered defendants themselves to produce documents in response to plaintiffs' Request for Production of Documents, subject to the objections and privileges asserted in their March 16, 2015 response. The court has not yet addressed any objections raised by defendants as to their own production of documents, including defendants' assertion that Gramm-Leach-Bliley precludes their production of documents. The court does expect that the parties will meet and confer and attempt to resolve that issue before bringing a further motion to compel or for a protective order.
Defendants' further request for an extension of time to produce the documents subject to the August 12, 2015, order is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
