Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. DELGIZZI, 15-MC-91180-DPW/MPK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts Number: infdco20150824b97 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE UNITED STATES' PETITION FOR AN ORDER ENFORCING AN INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS M. PAGE KELLEY , Magistrate Judge . A Petition to Enforce an Internal Revenue Service administrative summons having been referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for hearing, and said hearing having been held on July 27, 2015, and the Respondent, David Delgizzi, having failed to show any cause why he should not obey the Summons issued to him on December 5, 20
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE UNITED STATES' PETITION FOR AN ORDER ENFORCING AN INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE SUMMONS

A Petition to Enforce an Internal Revenue Service administrative summons having been referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for hearing, and said hearing having been held on July 27, 2015, and the Respondent, David Delgizzi, having failed to show any cause why he should not obey the Summons issued to him on December 5, 2014, the following report and recommendation is made:

This Court finds that, based upon the Declaration of Revenue Officer John Egan (Docket Entry #2), the United States has established a valid basis for the issuance of an Order enforcing the IRS summons, in accordance with 26 U.S.C. §§ 7402(b), 7602 and 7604(a) and United States v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964).

Accordingly, this Court RECOMMENDS that the Petition of the United States for an Order Enforcing Internal Revenue Summons (Docket Entry # 1) be GRANTED, and that an Order issue, directing the Respondent to obey the Summons within 30 days, upon pain of a finding of contempt of court.

Any objections to this Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within 14 days of receipt of this Report and Recommendation. Any party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after service of the objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the order. United States v. Escoboza Vega, 678 F.2d 376, 378-379 (1st Cir. 1982); United States v. Valencia-St. Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer