Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. BAKER, 13-11078-RGS. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts Number: infdco20150928b81 Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2015
Summary: FURTHER ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED FORM OF FINAL JUDGMENT RICHARD G. STEARNS , District Judge . I agree generally with the defendants that the Proposed Form of Final Judgment submitted by the United States imports a lien tracing theory that, while not rejected by the court in its Findings and Rulings, was also not embraced. See Dkt. # 86, at 30-31 n.20. The court based its decision rather on the law governing fraudulent transfers, pointing out that a divorce may be bona fide, but the d
More

FURTHER ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED FORM OF FINAL JUDGMENT

I agree generally with the defendants that the Proposed Form of Final Judgment submitted by the United States imports a lien tracing theory that, while not rejected by the court in its Findings and Rulings, was also not embraced. See Dkt. # 86, at 30-31 n.20. The court based its decision rather on the law governing fraudulent transfers, pointing out that a divorce may be bona fide, but the division of property nonetheless a fraud on creditors. The court in this regard found the transactions identified in its Ultimate Rulings ¶¶ 2-3, and 4, to have been fraudulently undertaken to defeat Scott Baker's accrued tax liabilities. The court will give the United States as the prevailing party, an additional fourteen days (until October 12, 2015) to submit a Proposed Form of Final Judgment that conforms more strictly to the court's decision.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer