GUARRIELO v. FAMILY ENDOWMENT PARTNERS, LP, 14-cv-13351-IT. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20151013b84
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . Before the court are Defendants' Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas [#60] and Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas [#66]. As a threshold matter, the court lacks the authority to quash subpoenas that require compliance in a district other than the District of Massachusetts. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3)(A) ("On timely motion, the court for the district where com
Summary: ORDER INDIRA TALWANI , District Judge . Before the court are Defendants' Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas [#60] and Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas [#66]. As a threshold matter, the court lacks the authority to quash subpoenas that require compliance in a district other than the District of Massachusetts. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3)(A) ("On timely motion, the court for the district where comp..
More
ORDER
INDIRA TALWANI, District Judge.
Before the court are Defendants' Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas [#60] and Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas [#66]. As a threshold matter, the court lacks the authority to quash subpoenas that require compliance in a district other than the District of Massachusetts. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(d)(3)(A) ("On timely motion, the court for the district where compliance is required must quash or modify a subpoena. . . ."). Accordingly, the motion to quash is DENIED without prejudice as the subpoenas issued to Bank of America N.A., Wintrust Financial Corporation and Northbrook Bank and Trust Company. See Flynn Aff'd, Ex. 9 in Pl.'s Opp'n Mot. Quash [#64-13]. As to the recently served subpoenas that require compliance in the District of Massachusetts, the court in ALLOWS Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum of Law limited to five pages. Defendants may file the reply memorandum no later than October 14, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
