U.S. v. DENUNZIO, 14-10284-NMG. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20160421758
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER NATHANIEL M. GORTON , District Judge . Because defendants have not alleged that the government has intimidated or harassed a potential witness nor demonstrated that the government is withholding immunity from Attorney Feldman for the purpose of keeping exculpatory evidence from the jury, see United States v. Angiulo , 897 F.2d 1169 , 1190-93 (1st Cir. 1990), the Court is without authority to compel the government to provide Attorney Feldman immunity for his testimony at trial. Def
Summary: ORDER NATHANIEL M. GORTON , District Judge . Because defendants have not alleged that the government has intimidated or harassed a potential witness nor demonstrated that the government is withholding immunity from Attorney Feldman for the purpose of keeping exculpatory evidence from the jury, see United States v. Angiulo , 897 F.2d 1169 , 1190-93 (1st Cir. 1990), the Court is without authority to compel the government to provide Attorney Feldman immunity for his testimony at trial. Defe..
More
ORDER
NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge.
Because defendants have not alleged that the government has intimidated or harassed a potential witness nor demonstrated that the government is withholding immunity from Attorney Feldman for the purpose of keeping exculpatory evidence from the jury, see United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169, 1190-93 (1st Cir. 1990), the Court is without authority to compel the government to provide Attorney Feldman immunity for his testimony at trial. Defendants' Motion for a Judgment of Acquittal (Docket No. 415) is therefore DENIED.
So ordered.
Source: Leagle
