Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Tsarnaev, 13-10200-GAO. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts Number: infdco20160919a47 Visitors: 15
Filed: Sep. 16, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER GEORGE A. O'TOOLE, Jr. , District Judge . Having considered the parties' submissions regarding unsealing, the Court hereby directs the Clerk's Office to unseal the following entries and attached documents: 303.02 400.02 603 679 303.04 400.03 604.02 692 328 400.04 610 727.01 328.01 400.
More

ORDER

Having considered the parties' submissions regarding unsealing, the Court hereby directs the Clerk's Office to unseal the following entries and attached documents:

303.02 400.02 603 679 303.04 400.03 604.02 692 328 400.04 610 727.01 328.01 400.05 611 741.02 349A 403 615 747 349B 404 626 784.13 349C 404.01 626.01 784.14 349D 404.02 626.02 789.28 349E 404.03 626.03 789.29 349F 404.04 626.04 814.02 349G 439 626.05 913 349I 440.02 633 913.01 349K 440.03 635 921 349L 444 635.01 960 349M 445 635.02 1059 349N 464.02 635.03 1095 387.01 464.04 635.04 1284 388.01 466.02 658 1292 400 466.04 658.01 1507 400.01 568 664

The following docket entries shall have redacted copies of the sealed documents added to the public docket:

303.06 604.04 818.11 1209 349H 604.06 825.01 1227.01 349J 604.07 848.02 1253 440.05 604.08 848.03 1282.02 440.06 604.09 850.03 1282.03 464.01 669 858.01 1284.01 464.03 698 867 1284.02 466.01 741 868 1292.01 466.03 741.01 875.01 1327 568.06 749 875.02 1346.01 602.03 784.15 898 1371 602.04 785.05 934.01 1376 602.06 785.06 936 1379.01 602.07 786.13 1059.01 1380.01 602.08 812.13 1069 1400.011 602.09 814.03 1182 604.03 814.04 1201.01

The following docket entries addressed by the parties shall remain sealed:

951.01 975 1094.01 1106.02 952.01 981 1094.03 1124 958 994 1096 1125 959 994.01 1097 1126 960.01 1042.01 1100.01 1127 961.01 1042.02 1100.03 1128 967 1064 1105.01 1400.02 968 1065 1106.01 1509

The technical process of executing this Order by the Clerk will proceed as expeditiously as practicable.

It is SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. With respect to Docket No. 1400.01, the only paper as to which the parties disagree concerning the redactions to be made, the defendant's suggested redactions will be used except for an additional redaction on page four of the seven words following "The prosecution knew at the time that there was contrary evidence, . . ."
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer