Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Steinberg v. Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 1:16-cv-11668. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts Number: infdco20170118i35 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND RESERVING JURISDICTION FOR PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S APPLICATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES & REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES GEORGE A. O'TOOLE, Jr. , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the above-captioned action (the "Action") challenging the public disclosures made in the preliminary proxy statement filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on or around August 8, 2016 in connection with the proposed acquisition o
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION AND RESERVING JURISDICTION FOR PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S APPLICATION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS' FEES & REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed the above-captioned action (the "Action") challenging the public disclosures made in the preliminary proxy statement filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on or around August 8, 2016 in connection with the proposed acquisition of Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Aegerion") by QLT Inc. ("Parent") through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Isotope Acquisition Corp. ("Merger Sub," and together with Parent, "QLT");

WHEREAS, the Action asserts claims for violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;;

WHEREAS, on or around October 6, 2016, Aegerion filed a Definitive Proxy Statement with the SEC;

WHEREAS, on or around October 20, 2016, Aegerion filed a Form 8-K supplementing the disclosures contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement (the "Supplemental Disclosures"), which Plaintiff believes addressed and mooted his claims regarding the sufficiency of the disclosures in the preliminary proxy statement;

WHEREAS, it is the current intention of counsel for Plaintiff to submit an application for an award of attorneys' fees and reimbursement of expenses (the "Fee and Expense Application") in connection with the claims that they believe have been mooted;

WHEREAS, all of the Defendants in the Action reserve the right to oppose any potential Fee and Expense Application;

WHEREAS, no class has been certified in the Action;

WHEREAS, for the avoidance of doubt, no compensation in any form has passed directly or indirectly to Plaintiff or her attorneys and no promise, understanding, or agreement to give any such compensation has been made, nor have the parties had any discussions concerning the amount of any mootness fee application or award;

WHEREAS, Defendants do not admit that the Supplemental Disclosures contain any material information or disclose additional material facts, and Defendants have denied and continue to deny any wrongdoing and contend that no claim asserted in the Action was ever meritorious;

NOW, THEREFORE, upon consent of the parties and subject to the approval of the Court:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 27th day of December, 2016 that:

1. The Action is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), and all claims asserted therein are dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff, individually, and without prejudice as to any actual or potential claims of any other putative class member.

2. Because the dismissal is with prejudice as to Plaintiff only, and without prejudice as to all other members of the putative class, notice of this dismissal is not required.

3. The Court retains jurisdiction of the Action solely for the purpose of hearing and deciding Plaintiff's forthcoming Fee and Expense Application.

4. This Order is entered without prejudice to any position, claim or defense any party may assert with respect to the Fee and Expense Application or any matter related thereto, which includes the Defendants' right to challenge the basis for, as well as the amount of, the Fee and Expense Application.

5. The parties shall meet and confer concerning Plaintiff's potential Fee and Expenses Application. To the extent that the parties are unable to reach an agreement concerning the Fee and Expense Application, they will contact the Court to set a stipulated briefing and hearing schedule for Plaintiff's Fee and Expense Application.

6. If the parties reach an agreement concerning the Fee and Expense Application, they will notify the Court. Upon such notification, the Court will close the Action.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer