OXFORD IMMUNOTEC LTD. v. QIAGEN N.V., 1:15-cv-13124-NMG. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20170224812
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 11, 2017
Summary: JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PROTOCOL FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS NATHANIEL M. GORTON , District Judge . Plaintiff Oxford Immunotec Limited ("Oxford") and defendants Qiagen, Inc. ("Qiagen"), Quest Diagnostics Incorporated ("Quest"), and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings ("LabCorp") respectfully request that the Court enter both (1) the Joint Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order Regarding the Treatment of Confidential Information ("Protective Order"), attached as Exhibit
Summary: JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PROTOCOL FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS NATHANIEL M. GORTON , District Judge . Plaintiff Oxford Immunotec Limited ("Oxford") and defendants Qiagen, Inc. ("Qiagen"), Quest Diagnostics Incorporated ("Quest"), and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings ("LabCorp") respectfully request that the Court enter both (1) the Joint Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order Regarding the Treatment of Confidential Information ("Protective Order"), attached as Exhibit ..
More
JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND PROTOCOL FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
NATHANIEL M. GORTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff Oxford Immunotec Limited ("Oxford") and defendants Qiagen, Inc. ("Qiagen"), Quest Diagnostics Incorporated ("Quest"), and Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings ("LabCorp") respectfully request that the Court enter both (1) the Joint Stipulated [Proposed] Protective Order Regarding the Treatment of Confidential Information ("Protective Order"), attached as Exhibit A, and (2) the Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding the Protocol for the Production of Electronically Stored Information and Hard Copy Documents ("ESI Stipulation"), attached as Exhibit B.
In support of this Motion, the Parties represent that disclosures and discovery activity in this litigation are likely to involve confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure is warranted. Entry of the proposed joint stipulated Protective Order will permit discovery to proceed expeditiously without jeopardizing the confidential treatment of such information. Additionally, the Parties anticipate that entry of the subject to the caveat on page 9 of the order, motion allowed.
Source: Leagle
