Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PADMANABHAN v. PAIKOS, 17-10936-NMG. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts Number: infdco20170905701 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jul. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER NATHANIEL M. GORTON , District Judge . This case arises out of a dispute involving the indefinite suspension of a medical license held by Dr. Bharanidharam Padmanabhan a/k/a Dr. Bharani ("plaintiff"). Plaintiff alleges that several members and employees of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine (collectively, "defendants"), violated his due process and equal protection rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment by suspending his medical license. Now pending before the
More

ORDER

This case arises out of a dispute involving the indefinite suspension of a medical license held by Dr. Bharanidharam Padmanabhan a/k/a Dr. Bharani ("plaintiff"). Plaintiff alleges that several members and employees of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine (collectively, "defendants"), violated his due process and equal protection rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment by suspending his medical license.

Now pending before the Court is plaintiff's motion for "recusal and substitution/reassignment".

Plaintiff avers that this case should be reassigned to a different session because the assigned judge demonstrated bias in favor of Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey and others in an earlier case in which this Court dismissed plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.1 See generally Padmanabhan v. Healey, 159 F.Supp.3d 220 (D. Mass. 2016).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), a judge

shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

Although plaintiff complains caustically of bias, the First Circuit Court of Appeals has concluded that the judicial officer assigned to this case has exhibited no bias in the previous lawsuit and summarily affirmed the rulings of this Court. See Padmanabhan v. Healey, No. 16-1159 (1st Cir. entered Jan. 4, 2017) (appeal pending). Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for recusal and reassignment (Docket No. 7) is DENIED.

So ordered.

FootNotes


1. James Paikos and Loretta Cooke, employees of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Medicine, are the only two defendants named in both cases.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer