Cameron v. Mederios, 17-10280-RGS. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20180206c18
Visitors: 17
Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD G. STEARNS , District Judge . I agree with Magistrate Judge Kelley's succinct analysis and her conclusion that petitioner James Cameron has failed to exhaust the claims in his petition as required by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Dearth Penalty Act, 28 U.S.C. 2254(b)(1)(a), and, moreover, that no exception to the exhaustion requirement applies. 1 Consequently, her Recommendation is ADOPTED and the petition for habeas
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD G. STEARNS , District Judge . I agree with Magistrate Judge Kelley's succinct analysis and her conclusion that petitioner James Cameron has failed to exhaust the claims in his petition as required by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Dearth Penalty Act, 28 U.S.C. 2254(b)(1)(a), and, moreover, that no exception to the exhaustion requirement applies. 1 Consequently, her Recommendation is ADOPTED and the petition for habeas ..
More
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
RICHARD G. STEARNS, District Judge.
I agree with Magistrate Judge Kelley's succinct analysis and her conclusion that petitioner James Cameron has failed to exhaust the claims in his petition as required by the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Dearth Penalty Act, 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(1)(a), and, moreover, that no exception to the exhaustion requirement applies.1
Consequently, her Recommendation is ADOPTED and the petition for habeas relief is DISMISSED. Any request for the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is DENIED, the court seeing no meritorious or substantial basis that would support an interlocutory appeal.
SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. To date, Cameron has not filed any Objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Source: Leagle
