Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

IN RE PAYER, 10-17446-DER. (2012)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland Number: inbco20121017931 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 17, 2012
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER DIRECTING DISGORGEMENT OF FEES; AND PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL RELIEF DAVID E. RICE, Bankruptcy Judge. WHEREAS, on February 22, 2012, Michele L. Payer ("Ms. Payer") was disbarred; WHEREAS, prior thereto Ms. Payer practiced bankruptcy law in this Court; WHEREAS, on or about the date of her disbarment, Ms. Payer was counsel of record in forty-eight open Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases (the "Open Cases"); 1 WHEREAS, in the vast majority of the Open Cases Ms. Payer
More

STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER DIRECTING DISGORGEMENT OF FEES; AND PROVIDING FOR ADDITIONAL RELIEF

DAVID E. RICE, Bankruptcy Judge.

WHEREAS, on February 22, 2012, Michele L. Payer ("Ms. Payer") was disbarred;

WHEREAS, prior thereto Ms. Payer practiced bankruptcy law in this Court;

WHEREAS, on or about the date of her disbarment, Ms. Payer was counsel of record in forty-eight open Chapter 13 bankruptcy cases (the "Open Cases");1

WHEREAS, in the vast majority of the Open Cases Ms. Payer had entered into fee agreements (the "Paragraph 4B Fee Agreements") under MD Local Bankruptcy Rule 9010-6 and paragraph 4B of Appendix F which obligated Ms. Payer to provide legal representation for all matters in the main case;2

WHEREAS, the U.S. Trustee asserts that the Paragraph 4B Fee Agreements require Ms. Payer to provide legal representation until those cases are completed;

WHEREAS, Ms. Payer is unable to provide legal representation after February 22, 2012;

WHEREAS, the debtors in the Open Cases do not have legal representation after February 22, 2012 unless and until they retain new counsel despite their entry into the Paragraph 4B Fee Agreement which should have provided them with representation until their cases are completed;

WHEREAS, Ms. Payer has or had an administrative claim in each of the Open Cases for the full amount of her professional fee;

WHEREAS, the U.S. Trustee asserts that professional fees already paid to Ms. Payer for representation due to debtors after February 22, 2012 are subject to disgorgement pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329;

WHEREAS, the U.S. Trustee asserts any professional fees later paid to Ms. Payer on account of her administrative claims and under the terms of confirmed plans in the Open Cases for representation due to debtors after February 22, 2012 would be subject to disgorgement pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 329;

WHEREAS, Ms. Payer has earned fees for services rendered prior to February 22, 2012 in some of the Open Cases which fees have not been paid to her (the "Earned Fees");

WHEREAS, the U.S. Trustee takes the position that the Earned Fees are not an asset of Ms. Payer's bankruptcy case because until the Earned Fees are paid out of the Open Cases by the chapter 13 trustee they are either an asset of the estate in the Open Cases or they are held in trust for the benefit of debtors;

WHEREAS, the U.S. Trustee reviewed every Open Case and proposes a resolution of the fee/disgorgement issues created by Ms. Payer's disbarment in accordance with the reconciliation attached hereto as Exhibit A, which is explained in greater detail below;

WHEREAS, Ms. Payer has engaged in good faith settlement negotiations with the U.S. Trustee beginning as early as March, 2012;

WHEREAS, but for this agreement and Ms. Payer's voluntary cooperation with the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Trustee would have filed a motion for disgorgement of fees and other sanctions against Ms. Payer pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 105 and 329;

WHEREAS, the U.S. Trustee and Ms. Payer desire to resolve the U.S. Trustee's concerns regarding the Open Cases and the payment of her fees therein by the terms of this Stipulation and Consent Order.

NOW, THEREFORE, the U.S. Trustee and Ms. Payer do agree, stipulate and consent as follows:

The foregoing recitals are true and correct;

1. Attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A is a chart that inter alia: lists all of the Open Cases; indicates the fee charged to each respective debtor; indicates the amount of that fee paid to Ms. Payer to date; and indicates the amount of fee earned by Ms. Payer prior to February 22, 2012.

2. Without prejudice to the rights of any debtor to seek a different determination as to the amount of a fee disgorgement due from Ms. Payer, the U.S. Trustee and Ms. Payer agree that disgorgement as shown in columns AE and AF of Exhibit A is appropriate.

A. Cases bearing UST numbers 1 to 5 include a fee agreement that does not conform to current Appendix F with fees charged of either $3,000 or $3,500. Each of the debtors in cases 1 to 5 was represented for 41 to 54 months post-confirmation as of February 22, 2012. The U.S. Trustee and Ms. Payer agree that fees charged in those cases were fully earned and the debtors in cases 1 to 5 have been determined to have no claim for disgorgement. B. Cases bearing UST numbers 6 to 41 include a Paragraph 4B Fee Agreement. As of February 22, 2012, each debtor had been represented at least to an order of confirmation. The disgorgement amounts were figured using Appendix F as a guide to allow compensation until February 22, 2012 when representation ended: (i) $2,000 (or when the fee charged was less than $4,500, 44% of total fee charged) earned at order of confirmation;3 (ii) $3,500 (or when the fee charged was less than $4,500, 78% of total fee charged) earned 90 days after order of confirmation;4 (iii) the remaining portion earned pro rata over each month remaining in the plan.5 C. Cases bearing UST numbers 42 to 48 were resolved on a case-by-case basis because of their specific facts. (i) UST #42 — In this case, Ms. Payer withdrew prior to confirmation. Ms. Payer received $1,500 of her $4,500 fee before the case was filed. Amendments were required after Ms. Payer withdrew to get the case to confirmation and new counsel was engaged. The debtor's confirmed plan does not escrow any funds for Ms. Payer's benefit. For the purposes of this settlement, it is agreed between Ms. Payer and the U.S. Trustee that no fee disgorgement is appropriate. (ii) UST #43 — In this case, Ms. Payer withdrew after confirmation and at the request of the debtor. For the purposes of this settlement, it is agreed between Ms. Payer and the U.S. Trustee that no fee disgorgement is appropriate. (iii) UST #44 — Ms. Payer handled this case without charge to the debtor. (iv) UST #45 — This case was dismissed after confirmation upon the debtor's motion. Ms. Payer represented the debtor for the entirety of the case. For the purposes of this settlement, it is agreed between Ms. Payer and the U.S. Trustee that no fee disgorgement is appropriate. (v) UST #46 — This case did not reach confirmation prior to the termination of Ms. Payer's representation. New counsel charged a fee of $600 and immediately converted the case to one under chapter 7. For the purposes of this settlement, it is agreed between Ms. Payer and the U.S. Trustee that a disgorgement of $600 is appropriate. (vi) UST #47 — In this case, an order for confirmation was entered after the termination of Ms. Payer's representation. The debtor(s) engaged new counsel for the purposes of getting to confirmation and agreed to pay new counsel the full amount being escrowed under their confirmed plan for administrative fees including legal fee balance. The debtor's confirmed plan does not escrow any funds for Ms. Payer's benefit. For the purposes of this settlement, it is agreed between Ms. Payer and the U.S. Trustee that no fee disgorgement is appropriate. (vii) UST #46 — This case did not reach confirmation prior to the termination of Ms. Payer's representation. New counsel charged a fee of $995 and immediately converted the case to one under chapter 7. For the purposes of this settlement, it is agreed between Ms. Payer and the U.S. Trustee that a disgorgement of $995 is appropriate.

3. The U.S. Trustee and Ms. Payer agree that fees for which disgorgement is appropriate amount to $25,112 (the "Total Disgorgement Amount").

4. Of the Total Disgorgement Amount, $14,274 has been paid to Ms. Payer either directly by debtors prior to case commencement or by the chapter 13 trustees pursuant to Ms. Payer's administrative claims (the "Paid Fees Subject to Disgorgement").

5. The Paid Fees Subject to Disgorgement are reflected in column AF of Exhibit A.

6. The U.S. Trustee and Ms. Payer agree that Ms. Payer holds claims for Earned Fees in eleven of the Open Cases as reflected in column AB of Exhibit A in the amount of $11,113.

7. Ms. Payer agrees to, and upon entry of this order, does hereby assign her claims for Earned Fees to the order of Nancy Spencer Grigsby, Trustee ("Ms. Grigsby").

8. The chapter 13 trustees are directed to pay, only from the escrow account of a debtor in an Open Case with an Amount Remaining Due to Ms. Payer reflected in column AB of Exhibit A, the Earned Fees to the order of Ms. Grigsby in the same priority and order as they would normally pay an administrative legal fee claim.

9. Until such time as no Open Case remains, Ms. Grigsby agrees to marshal the Earned Fees and shall, on a monthly basis, distribute the Earned Fees among the debtors having paid fees subject to disgorgement as reflected in column AF of Exhibit A in a pro rata manner.

10. Of the Total Disgorgement Amount, $10,838 has not been paid to Ms. Payer but is either currently on deposit in an escrow account for an Open Case or will be paid into an escrow account for an Open Case as (and if) the debtors in the Open Cases perform their confirmed plans (the "Unpaid Fees Subject to Disgorgement").

11. The chapter 13 trustees are directed to pay, only from the escrow account of a debtor in an Open Case reflecting Unpaid Fees Subject to Disgorgement in column AE of Exhibit A, the Unpaid Fees Subject to Disgorgement to the debtors in the same priority and order as they would normally pay an administrative legal fee claim except that the Unpaid Fees Subject to Disgorgement shall not be paid until after full payment of the Earned Fees.

12. The provisions of this Order shall remain enforceable after any dismissal of this bankruptcy case and until such time as no Open Case remain open.

Having reviewed the terms and conditions of this Stipulation and Consent Order and finding the terms and conditions contained herein to be reasonable, it is by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland, SO ORDERED.

Exhibit A

A B C K N U AB AE Amount Unpaid Fees Original Ramaining Due Subject to 2016(b) Total Paid to To Ms. Payer Disgorgement UST # Case No Name Attorney Fee Date Earned Fees (U-N) (K-U) 1 07-13591 Blount 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000 2 07-15276 White 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000 3 08-15182 Harper 3,000.00 3,000.00 3,000 4 08-16058 Gullion 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500 5 08-16179 Mohr/Brewer 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500 6 08-22179 Dulaney 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,682 7 08-22592 Cohen 3,000.00 3,000.00 2,754 8 08-24398 Thomas 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500 9 08-24524 Simpson 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,081 10 08-24675 Lawless 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,645 11 08-25057 Grafton 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,644 12 08-25058 Allen 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,283 13 08-25930 Waters 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,078 14 09-11140 White 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,606 15 09-11742 Day 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,054 16 09-12935 Watkins 4,000.00 4,000.00 3,603 17 09-13546 Jones 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,136 18 09-14058 Snyder 4,500.00 4,000.00 4,037 37 463 19 09-14685 Plymale 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,958 20 09-15802 Pregent 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,990 21 09-18071 Hall 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,973 22 09-20483 McClernan 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,960 23 09-25407 Strain 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,933 24 09-32175 Schinault 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,844 25 10-10783 Carberry 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,852 26 10-11080 Wheatley 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,787 27 10-13673 Thompson 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,798 28 10-30990 Link 4,500.00 500.00 3,658 3,158 842 29 10-31350 Reyes 4,000.00 2,586.96 3,298 711 702 30 10-32137 Arrington 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,661 31 11-13344 Tagg 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,609 32 11-15018 Epps 4,500.00 4,500.00 3,605 33 11-16239 Ritter 4,500.00 2,960.27 3,574 614 926 34 11-17083 Rogers 4,500.00 3,223.68 3,549 325 951 35 11-18881 Seling 3,500.00 3,500.00 2,786 36 11-19511 Bruce 4,500.00 2,900.82 3,522 622 978 37 11-23591 Dempsey 4,250.00 578.32 3,324 2,746 926 38 11-24337 Martin 4,500.00 2,218.43 3,500 1,282 1,000 39 11-25855 Harrypersad 4,500.00 2,463.00 3,500 1,037 1,000 40 11-26522 Fisher 2,500.00 1,868.00 1,950 82 550 41 11-29788 Ekonomides 4,500.00 1,500.00 2,000 500 2,500 42 09-26052 Berow 4,500.00 1,500.00 1,500 43 09-28810 Pascua-Smerk 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500 44 09-31299 Abbott 0 - 45 10-26911 Cushner 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500 46 11-32920 Phyall 4,500.00 1,500.00 900 47 11-33577 Iroanya 4,500.00 1,500.00 1,500 48 12-11284 Knight 4,500.00 1,500.00 505 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ TOTALS 193,250 159,299 156,138 11,113 10,838 Robert Blount, Jr. 7407 Prince George Road Pikesville, MD 21208 Matthew Arnold White & Mary Ann White 216 Shell Falls Drive Apollo Beach, FL 33572-3128 Toni Harper 4005 9th Street, NE, Apt 2 Washington, DC 20017 Roger L. Gullion, Jr. 1135 Poplar Grove Road Street, MD 21154 Michael Mohr & Christine Brewer 7259 Bridgewood Drive Baltimore, MD 21224 Philip & Nancy Dulaney, Jr. 7932 Central Road Pasadena, MD 21122 Kenneth Cohen 8114 Clyde Bank Road Parkville, MD Barbara A. Thomas 1237 Linkside Drive Parkville, MD 21234 Robert Simpson Jr. & Betty Simpson 2400 Beaver Crossing Road Edgewood, MD 21040 Timothy J. Lawless 1932 Hilltop Road Jessup, MD 20794 Adam Alexander Grafton 1455 Kirkwood Road Gwynn Oak, MD 21207-4859 Audrey Allen 1319 Sherwood Avenue Baltimore, MD 21239 Curtis & Dorthea Waters 1552 Putty Hill Avenue Towson, MD 21286 Brian & Stephanie White 6 Powderock Place Nottingham, MD 21236 Robert P. Day, Jr. 1613 Grafton Shop Road Forest Hill, MD 21050 Kenneth A. Watkins, Sr. 4102 Maple Shade Drive Baltimore, MD 21213 Camille A Jones 1006 Mentor Avenue Capital Heights, MD 20743 Elzie B. Snyder, Jr. 25865 Kings Lane Millsboro, DE 19966-6632 Jorge & Cheryl Plymale 40 Cherrywood Court Cockeysville, MD 21030 Christopher W. Pregent 406 Joyce Drive SW Glen Burnie, MD 21061-3371 Diane B. Hall 13612 Colgate Way Apt. 435 Silver Spring, MD 20904 Chuck James McClernan, III 9812 Monroe Street Cockeysville, MD 21030 Bill & Carolyn Strain 1601 Adrienne Court Forest Hill, MD 21050 Ronald & Deborah Schinault 1881 Lakeland Drive Finksburg, MD 21048 Stephanie D Carberry 6416 Craigmont Rd. Gwynn Oak, MD 21207 Donna A. Wheatley 522 47th Street Baltimore, MD 21224 Angelina Thompson 2829 Maudlin Avenue Baltimore, MD 21230 Mary Jo Link P.O. Box 162 Lutherville/Timonium, MD 21094 Anselmo & Hee Reyes 15820 Deep Creek Lane Tampa, FL 33624 Shelly L. Arrington 6874 Sturbridge Drive Apartment D Parkville, MD 21234 Russell M. Tagg 12601 Manor Road Glen Arm, MD 21057 Lawrence & Cassandre Epps 10506 Long Branch Road Cockeysville, MD 21030 Maurice & Peggy Ritter 4202 Elsa Terrace Baltimore, MD 21211 Christopher J. Rogers 43 Warren Common Cockeysville, MD 21030 Anne Marie Seling 4733 Fawn Grove Road Pylesville, MD 21132 Bryan A. Bruce 228 Cheddington Road Linthicum Heights, MD 21090 Colita Lynette Dempsey 4722 Amberley Avenue Baltimore, MD 21229 Charles R. Martin, III & Dawn Martin 3010 4th Avenue Parkville, MD 21234 Laura P. Harrypersad 5812 Gist Avenue Baltimore, MD 21215 William Fisher 5705 Winner Avenue Baltimore, MD 21215 Emmanuel G Ekonomides PO Box 43504 Nottingham, MD 21236 Jeffrey & Abby Berow 30 Somers Ct. Cockeysville, MD 21030 Kimberly A. Pascua-Smrek 326 Beaumont Avenue Catonsville, MD 21228 Laura E Abbott 2508 Appaloosa Way Finksburg, MD 21048 Bryan Cushner PO Box 1416 Owings Mills, MD 21117 Smith Phyall, Jr. & Diane Phyall 4113 Chatham Road Gwynn Oak, MD 21207 Ifeoma N Iroanya 2901 Tallowtree Road Woodstock, MD 21163 Jeffrey S. Knight 3015 Edgewood Avenue Parkville, MD 21234 Allan G Nelson Law Office of Allan G. Nelson 9 West Courtland St Suite 202 Bel Air, MD 21014 Antonio Aquia 220 North Liberty Street Baltimore, MD 21201 Shawn W. Carter 807 N. Calvert St., Fl. 2 Baltimore, MD 21202 Candy L. Thompson Candy L. Thompson, LLC 201 N. Charles St., Ste. 804 Baltimore, MD 21201 Michael A. Ostroff Montero Law Group, LLC Executive Court 1738 Elton Road, Suite 105 Silver Spring, MD 20903 Edward C. Christman, Jr. Christman & Fascetta, LLC 810 Gleneagles Court Suite 301 Towson, MD 21286 Cornelius J. Carmody 16940 York Road PO Box 302 Monkton, MD 21111 Jay B. Shuster 100 Church Lane Baltimore, MD 21208 Dennis Michael Jaworski 511B Eastern Blvd. Suite D Baltimore, MD 21221 Jason E. Miles 19 E. Fayette Street Suite 401 Baltimore, MD 21202 Chester H. Hobbs, IV Bodie, Dolina, Smith & Hobbs, P.C. 21 W. Susquehanna Ave. Towson, MD 21204 Maximillian F. Van Orden LeViness, Tolzman & Hamilton, P.A. 923 N. Calvert Street Baltimore, MD 21202

FootNotes


1. The spreadsheet attached hereto and incorporated herein as "Exhibit A" lists the cases.
2. There are only six exceptions. The fee disclosures for first five cases on the spreadsheet (numbered 1-5) do not reference Appendix F and the fee disclosure filed in the Abbott case (numbered 26) indicates that no fee was charged in that case at all.
3. UST #41 is the only case in this category. The order of confirmation was entered on 2/10/12. The fee agreement called for a fee of $4,500. The agreement is that the fee earned in that case is $2,000.
4. UST #38-40 are all in this category with representation ranging from 73 to 110 days after the orders of confirmation are entered. The agreement is that the fees earned in these cases is $3,500 in the two cases where the full fee called for by the fee agreement was $4,500 and 78% of the fee ($1,950) in the case where the full fee called for by the fee agreement was $2,500.
5. UST # 6-37 are in this category. For each of these cases, the U.S. Trustee determined how many months each debtor would have to perform under their plan from the date that is 90 days after confirmation to the date plan completion is due and divided the fee remaining to be paid over that number of months. Then the number of months that the debtor was represented by Ms. Payer between the date that is +90 days post confirmation and February 22, 2012 was determined. The dollar figure was multiplied by the number of months which determined the amount of the remaining fee earned by Ms. Payer. Disgorgement was deemed appropriate in all but one of the cases in this category. Only UST # 8 reflects a zero and this is accurate because the debtor's plan completion date was figured to be 2/21/12.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer