Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE v. KUM, 99 A.3d 288 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals of Maryland Number: inmdco20140910245 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2014
Summary: PER CURIAM ORDER. For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 10th day September, 2014, ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Joseph Mua Kum, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joseph Mua Kum from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that
More

PER CURIAM ORDER.

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 10th day September, 2014,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the Respondent, Joseph Mua Kum, be, and he is hereby, disbarred, effective immediately, from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Joseph Mua Kum from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-760(e), shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the clerks of all judicial tribunals in the State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall pay all costs as taxed by the Clerk of this Court, including the costs of all transcripts, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-761(b), for which sum judgment is entered in favor of the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland against Joseph Mua Kum.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer