TASTE GASTRO PUB, LLC v. LLEDO, JFM-15-2522. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Maryland
Number: infdco20160601a66
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 31, 2016
Latest Update: May 31, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ , District Judge . Defendant Daniel Lledo has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint. The motion is based upon the fact that at the time the amended complaint was filed, plaintiff's status as a limited liability company organized under Maryland law was declared forfeited. Plaintiff has now had its status reinstated. Defendant's motion will be denied. He seeks dismissal of the action with prejudice. Obviously, in light of the fact that plainti
Summary: MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ , District Judge . Defendant Daniel Lledo has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint. The motion is based upon the fact that at the time the amended complaint was filed, plaintiff's status as a limited liability company organized under Maryland law was declared forfeited. Plaintiff has now had its status reinstated. Defendant's motion will be denied. He seeks dismissal of the action with prejudice. Obviously, in light of the fact that plaintif..
More
MEMORANDUM
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Defendant Daniel Lledo has filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint.
The motion is based upon the fact that at the time the amended complaint was filed, plaintiff's status as a limited liability company organized under Maryland law was declared forfeited. Plaintiff has now had its status reinstated.
Defendant's motion will be denied. He seeks dismissal of the action with prejudice. Obviously, in light of the fact that plaintiff's status as a limited liability company has been reinstated, dismissal of the action with prejudice would be unwarranted. Likewise, to dismiss the action without prejudice would cause unnecessary cost and inconvenience in light of the fact that plaintiff's status has been reinstated.
A separate order denying defendant's motion is being entered herewith.
Source: Leagle