GORDON v. UCG HOLDINGS LP, RWT 16-0238. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Maryland
Number: infdco20160829989
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 25, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM Counsel of Record ROGER W. TITUS , District Judge . On August 23, 2016, counsel for the Parties sent a letter to the Court jointly requesting that the above-captioned case be referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for the purpose of participating in an early settlement conference [ECF No. 52]. The Parties further requested that the remaining Scheduling Order deadlines and discovery be stayed pending the outcome of the settlement conference. Having referred the case to Mag
Summary: MEMORANDUM Counsel of Record ROGER W. TITUS , District Judge . On August 23, 2016, counsel for the Parties sent a letter to the Court jointly requesting that the above-captioned case be referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for the purpose of participating in an early settlement conference [ECF No. 52]. The Parties further requested that the remaining Scheduling Order deadlines and discovery be stayed pending the outcome of the settlement conference. Having referred the case to Magi..
More
MEMORANDUM
Counsel of Record
ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge.
On August 23, 2016, counsel for the Parties sent a letter to the Court jointly requesting that the above-captioned case be referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for the purpose of participating in an early settlement conference [ECF No. 52]. The Parties further requested that the remaining Scheduling Order deadlines and discovery be stayed pending the outcome of the settlement conference.
Having referred the case to Magistrate Judge Jillyn Schulze, the remaining Scheduling Order deadlines and discovery are hereby STAYED pending the outcome of the settlement conference. In the event that the settlement conference is unsuccessful, discovery shall resume and the Parties shall submit a revised Scheduling Order for the Court's consideration and approval.
Despite the informal nature of this ruling, it shall constitute an Order of the Court, and the Clerk is directed to docket it accordingly.
Source: Leagle
