U.S. v. BOWMAN, JFM-05-0587 (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Maryland
Number: infdco20161017553
Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ , District Judge . Cedrick Bowman has filed this action under 28 U.S.C. 2255, claiming that he is entitled to relief under Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). Bowman is incorrect. He was sentenced significantly below the career offender advisory guideline range. Rather, as to count I he was sentenced to the guideline range that would have applied without the career offender enhancement, and to a mandatory 120 months consecutive on count II.
Summary: MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ , District Judge . Cedrick Bowman has filed this action under 28 U.S.C. 2255, claiming that he is entitled to relief under Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). Bowman is incorrect. He was sentenced significantly below the career offender advisory guideline range. Rather, as to count I he was sentenced to the guideline range that would have applied without the career offender enhancement, and to a mandatory 120 months consecutive on count II. A..
More
MEMORANDUM
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Cedrick Bowman has filed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, claiming that he is entitled to relief under Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). Bowman is incorrect. He was sentenced significantly below the career offender advisory guideline range. Rather, as to count I he was sentenced to the guideline range that would have applied without the career offender enhancement, and to a mandatory 120 months consecutive on count II.
A separate order denying Bowman's motion is being entered herewith.
Source: Leagle
