JONES v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, JFM-16-2873. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Maryland
Number: infdco20161129b77
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ , District Judge . Plaintiff has instituted this pro se action. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss. After being advised of the consequences of a failure to do so, plaintiff has not responded to the motion. The motion will be granted. Plaintiff asserts a claim for breach of contract. However, the Employee Handbook makes it clear that plaintiff was an at will employee. Plaintiff also states a claim for wrongful discharge. However, the public policy upon
Summary: MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ , District Judge . Plaintiff has instituted this pro se action. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss. After being advised of the consequences of a failure to do so, plaintiff has not responded to the motion. The motion will be granted. Plaintiff asserts a claim for breach of contract. However, the Employee Handbook makes it clear that plaintiff was an at will employee. Plaintiff also states a claim for wrongful discharge. However, the public policy upon w..
More
MEMORANDUM
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff has instituted this pro se action. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss. After being advised of the consequences of a failure to do so, plaintiff has not responded to the motion. The motion will be granted.
Plaintiff asserts a claim for breach of contract. However, the Employee Handbook makes it clear that plaintiff was an at will employee.
Plaintiff also states a claim for wrongful discharge. However, the public policy upon which he relies is the insurance of "the integrity of the employment pension system." He cites no legislative enactment or judicial opinion to support the existence of this public policy.
A separate order of dismissal is being entered herewith.
Source: Leagle
