OYEDOKUN v. STATE PERSONNEL DIRECTOR, MARYLAND MILITARY DEPARTMENT, JFM-16-3705. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Maryland
Number: infdco20170421a80
Visitors: 14
Filed: Mar. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ , District Judge . Plaintiff has filed this action for employment discrimination. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss. The motion will be granted. Plaintiff has failed to allege any facts that support his claim for discrimination. Although plaintiff is appearing pro se and pro se pleadings are to be construed liberally, at the least plaintiff must allege facts that make his claim plausible on its face. See Bell Atl. Corp v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 5
Summary: MEMORANDUM J. FREDERICK MOTZ , District Judge . Plaintiff has filed this action for employment discrimination. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss. The motion will be granted. Plaintiff has failed to allege any facts that support his claim for discrimination. Although plaintiff is appearing pro se and pro se pleadings are to be construed liberally, at the least plaintiff must allege facts that make his claim plausible on its face. See Bell Atl. Corp v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 57..
More
MEMORANDUM
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed this action for employment discrimination. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss. The motion will be granted.
Plaintiff has failed to allege any facts that support his claim for discrimination. Although plaintiff is appearing pro se and pro se pleadings are to be construed liberally, at the least plaintiff must allege facts that make his claim plausible on its face. See Bell Atl. Corp v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).
A separate order effecting the ruling made in this memorandum is being entered herewith.
Source: Leagle
