Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lane v. United States, CCB-13-0648. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Maryland Number: infdco20191011e80 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE , District Judge . Now pending is Tyran Lane's motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255, as supplemented following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019) and the Fourth Circuit's decision in U.S. v. Simms, 914 F.3d 229 , 233-34 (4th Cir. 2019) (en banc). (ECF Nos. 84, 85, 87, and 88) 1 The government has responded. Lane pled guilty on December 12, 2014, to conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery in violation
More

MEMORANDUM

Now pending is Tyran Lane's motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, as supplemented following the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Davis, 139 S.Ct. 2319 (2019) and the Fourth Circuit's decision in U.S. v. Simms, 914 F.3d 229, 233-34 (4th Cir. 2019) (en banc). (ECF Nos. 84, 85, 87, and 88)1 The government has responded.

Lane pled guilty on December 12, 2014, to conspiracy to commit Hobbs Act robbery in violation of 18 U.S. § 1951(a) (Count One), Hobbs Act robbery (Counts Eight and Twelve), and use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (Count Sixteen). He was sentenced to 72 months incarceration on Counts One, Eight, and Twelve, concurrent, and 84 months consecutive on Count Sixteen. According to the indictment, the crime of violence charged in connection with Count Sixteen was the conspiracy charged in Count One. As the government concedes, Hobbs Act conspiracy no longer qualifies as a crime of violence under either the force clause (Simms) or the residual clause (Davis). Accordingly, as requested by the government and anticipated in Davis, 139 S.Ct. at 2336, all of the sentences, as well as the 924(c) conviction, will be vacated, and Lane will be resentenced. Dean v. U.S., 137 S.Ct. 1170, 1176-77 (2017); United States v. Ventura, 864 F.3d 301, 309 (4th Cir. 2017).

A separate Order follows.

FootNotes


1. Lane's Motion to Supplement (ECF No. 88) will be granted.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer