McKenney v. Rubashkin, 2:15-cv-169-GZS. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20160526b88
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: May 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20) filed April 26, 2016, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED . Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED on Plaintiff's federal claims and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's federal claims. 2. Plaintiff's sta
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20) filed April 26, 2016, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED . Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED on Plaintiff's federal claims and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's federal claims. 2. Plaintiff's stat..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 20) filed April 26, 2016, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED on Plaintiff's federal claims and judgment is entered in favor of Defendants on Plaintiff's federal claims.
2. Plaintiff's state claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
