PLATT v. U.S., 1:16-cv-00232-GZS (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20160720a50
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2016
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 101) filed June 6, 2016, the Recommended Decision if AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: (1) the Petitioner's pending Section 2255 Motion (ECF No. 95) is hereby transferred to the First Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631 and First Circuit Rule 22.1(e); (2) a certificat
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 101) filed June 6, 2016, the Recommended Decision if AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: (1) the Petitioner's pending Section 2255 Motion (ECF No. 95) is hereby transferred to the First Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631 and First Circuit Rule 22.1(e); (2) a certificate..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 101) filed June 6, 2016, the Recommended Decision if AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1) the Petitioner's pending Section 2255 Motion (ECF No. 95) is hereby transferred to the First Circuit Court of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631 and First Circuit Rule 22.1(e);
(2) a certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S. §2253(c)(2).
Source: Leagle
