ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JOHN A. WOODCOCK, Jr., District Judge.

On March 31, 2016, the Government filed a motion requesting the Court to comply with the Supreme Court's guidance set forth in Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375 (2003). Gov't's Mot. to Comply (ECF No. 74). On August 4, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a recommended decision advising this Court to grant the Government's motion. Recommended Decision on Gov.'s Mot. to Comply (ECF No. 77). The parties filed no objections to the Recommended Decision.

The Court has performed a de novo review of the Recommended Decision and concurs with the recommendations for the reasons set forth in the decision. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED, and the Court GRANTS the Government's motion to comply.

Pursuant to Castro v. United States, the Court advises Mr. Hitchcock that it construes his pro se filing (ECF No. 68) to be a first Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Court further advises Mr. Castro that if at some point in the future he files a second or successive section 2255 motion, the recharacterization of this first section 2255 motion will subject him to the restrictions that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 imposes on second or successive collateral challenges. Finally, the Court advises Mr. Hitchcock that he has fourteen (14) days following this Order either to withdraw or to amend the motion if he wishes to do so.

SO ORDERED.