USA v. HALL, 2:02-CR-63-DBH-01. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20171222e93
Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On December 6, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion. The time within which to file objections expired on December 20, 2017, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On December 6, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion. The time within which to file objections expired on December 20, 2017, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
On December 6, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion. The time within which to file objections expired on December 20, 2017, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases. The petitioner's motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability shall issue pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
