Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Adams v. Monahan, 2:17-cv-00261-GZS. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Maine Number: infdco20180214d94 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (Docket No. 58) filed January 11, 2018, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: That Defendant Monahan's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Monahan and Defendant Carr; That the following Motions are
More

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (Docket No. 58) filed January 11, 2018, the Recommended Decision is AFFIRMED.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: That Defendant Monahan's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22) is GRANTED, and judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Monahan and Defendant Carr;

That the following Motions are DISMISSED AS MOOT: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 4); Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment (ECF No. 6); Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 9); Plaintiff's Motion to Inform the Court (ECF No. 11); Plaintiff's [Second] Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18); Plaintiff's [Second] Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 33); and Plaintiff's Motion/Brief Regarding Exhaustion Requirement (ECF No. 52).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer