Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Faucette, 2:13-CR-79-DBH-01. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Maine Number: infdco20180627b26 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On May 31, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion. The time within which to file objections expired on June 14, 2018, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDER
More

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On May 31, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion. The time within which to file objections expired on June 14, 2018, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases. The petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED. No certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases shall issue because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer