Sue M. v. Berryhill, 1:17-cv-303-NT. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20180823d30
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN , Chief District Judge . On August 3, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. (ECF No. 27). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Re
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE NANCY TORRESEN , Chief District Judge . On August 3, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. (ECF No. 27). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore ORDERED that the Rec..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
NANCY TORRESEN, Chief District Judge.
On August 3, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision. (ECF No. 27). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED and the Commissioner's Decision is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle