Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Richard K. v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, 1:18-cv-00145-JDL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Maine Number: infdco20181012c40 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JON D. LEVY , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge, John C. Nivison, filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 16) on Richard K.'s Period of Disability and Disability Insurance Benefits appeal with the Court on September 5, 2018, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2018) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The time within which to file objections expired on September 19, 2018, and no objections have been filed. Th
More

ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge, John C. Nivison, filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 16) on Richard K.'s Period of Disability and Disability Insurance Benefits appeal with the Court on September 5, 2018, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2018) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The time within which to file objections expired on September 19, 2018, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. Having reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, I concur with the Magistrate Judge's conclusions as set forth in his Recommended Decision.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 16) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED and the Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer