Murray v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2:15-cv-484-DBH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20181016920
Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2018
Summary: ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . The plaintiff has filed an "Objection to Courts' Decision" attacking my ruling of September 24, 2018. I will treat it as a motion for reconsideration, and the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The defendants say that it is moot because the deposition has now occurred. Whether or not it is moot, the plaintiff's arguments do not persuade me that my original ruling is incorrect and should be reconsidered.
Summary: ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . The plaintiff has filed an "Objection to Courts' Decision" attacking my ruling of September 24, 2018. I will treat it as a motion for reconsideration, and the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The defendants say that it is moot because the deposition has now occurred. Whether or not it is moot, the plaintiff's arguments do not persuade me that my original ruling is incorrect and should be reconsidered. ..
More
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
The plaintiff has filed an "Objection to Courts' Decision" attacking my ruling of September 24, 2018. I will treat it as a motion for reconsideration, and the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. The defendants say that it is moot because the deposition has now occurred. Whether or not it is moot, the plaintiff's arguments do not persuade me that my original ruling is incorrect and should be reconsidered.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
