Julie B. v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, 2:17-cv-00288-JAW. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20181105f05
Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. , District Judge . No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed August 22, 2018, (ECF No. 18), the Recommended Decision is accepted. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. , District Judge . No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed August 22, 2018, (ECF No. 18), the Recommended Decision is accepted. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur w..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., District Judge.
No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed August 22, 2018, (ECF No. 18), the Recommended Decision is accepted.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision be and hereby is AFFIRMED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
