Gordon v. U.S., 2:15-cr-00027-GZS (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20181212c25
Visitors: 35
Filed: Dec. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 439) filed on November 16, 2018, the Recommended Decision if AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: (1) An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases; (2) Petitioner's Motion for Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No. 430) is hereby DENIE
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 439) filed on November 16, 2018, the Recommended Decision if AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: (1) An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases; (2) Petitioner's Motion for Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (ECF No. 430) is hereby DENIED..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
No objections having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision (ECF No. 439) filed on November 16, 2018, the Recommended Decision if AFFIRMED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1) An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases;
(2) Petitioner's Motion for Habeas Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 430) is hereby DENIED.
(3) A certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 cases because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §2253(c)(2).
Source: Leagle
