Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Deane v. Transunion LLC, 2:18-cv-00482-JAW. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Maine Number: infdco20190313a37 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2019
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. , District Judge . No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed February 11, 2019, (ECF No. 13), the Recommended Decision is accepted. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision and I concur
More

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed February 11, 2019, (ECF No. 13), the Recommended Decision is accepted.

I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.

Accordingly, is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Complaint, Statement of Claim (ECF No. 1-1), be and hereby is DISMISSED and the Court DENIES the Defendant's request to order the Plaintiff to pay costs incurred in the Plaintiff's previously asserted claims.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer