U.S. v. Watson, 2:16-cr-00075-JDL-1. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20190320c46
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JON D. LEVY , Chief District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed a Recommended Decision (ECF No. 308) on February 5, 2019, on Xavier Watson's motion for a reduction of his sentence (ECF No. 282) and motion to credit time served in pre-trial detention (ECF No. 293), pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Neither party filed an objection to the Recom
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JON D. LEVY , Chief District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed a Recommended Decision (ECF No. 308) on February 5, 2019, on Xavier Watson's motion for a reduction of his sentence (ECF No. 282) and motion to credit time served in pre-trial detention (ECF No. 293), pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Neither party filed an objection to the Recomm..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JON D. LEVY, Chief District Judge.
United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed a Recommended Decision (ECF No. 308) on February 5, 2019, on Xavier Watson's motion for a reduction of his sentence (ECF No. 282) and motion to credit time served in pre-trial detention (ECF No. 293), pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). Neither party filed an objection to the Recommended Decision.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision. I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 308) is hereby ACCEPTED, and Watson's motion for a reduction of his sentence (ECF No. 282) and motion to credit time served in pre-trial detention (ECF No. 293) are DENIED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
