RASBERRY v. U.S., 2:15-cr-00127-JDL (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20190627a63
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jun. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JON D. LEVY , Chief District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 175) on Todd Rasberry's 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 Petition (ECF No. 170) on April 11, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Rasberry filed an Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 176) on April 23, 2019. After reviewing and considering the Magistrate Judge'
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JON D. LEVY , Chief District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 175) on Todd Rasberry's 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 Petition (ECF No. 170) on April 11, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Rasberry filed an Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 176) on April 23, 2019. After reviewing and considering the Magistrate Judge's..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JON D. LEVY, Chief District Judge.
United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 175) on Todd Rasberry's 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 Petition (ECF No. 170) on April 11, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Rasberry filed an Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 176) on April 23, 2019.
After reviewing and considering the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision. I concur with the Magistrate Judge's conclusions as set forth in his Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 175) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED, Rasberry's 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 Petition (ECF No. 170) is DISMISSED, and a certificate of appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases because no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253(c)(2) has been made.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
