Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Auritt v. Auritt, 2:18-CV-471-DBH. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Maine Number: infdco20190730c94
Filed: Jul. 29, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . The defendant has moved to dismiss the plaintiff's amended complaint "for lack of evidence and a [sic] claims which relief can not be granted." Mot. at 1 (ECF No. 68). As for the first ground, a motion to dismiss for lack of evidence is not appropriate at this stage of the proceedings where discovery has not been completed. Perhaps after discovery has closed, a motion for summary judgment will be appropriate, but the
More

ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

The defendant has moved to dismiss the plaintiff's amended complaint "for lack of evidence and a [sic] claims which relief can not be granted." Mot. at 1 (ECF No. 68). As for the first ground, a motion to dismiss for lack of evidence is not appropriate at this stage of the proceedings where discovery has not been completed. Perhaps after discovery has closed, a motion for summary judgment will be appropriate, but the defendant needs to familiarize herself first with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and District of Maine Local Rule 56. As for the second ground, the remainder of the defendant's one-page motion gives no basis to support a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted."

Accordingly, the defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer