Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Orsini, 2:16-CR-140-DBH-01. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Maine Number: infdco20190918962 Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On August 7, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion. The time within which to file objections expired on August 21, 2019, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is therefore O
More

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 7, 2019, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion. The time within which to file objections expired on August 21, 2019, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED without an evidentiary hearing. No certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases shall issue because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer