Gladu v. Maine Department of Corrections, 1:18-cv-00268-GZS. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20191119a55
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 24, 2019, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 51). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 52) October 21, 1019. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 54) on October 24, 2019. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended De
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE GEORGE Z. SINGAL , District Judge . The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 24, 2019, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 51). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 52) October 21, 1019. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 54) on October 24, 2019. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Dec..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
The United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court on October 24, 2019, his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 51). Plaintiff filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 52) October 21, 1019. Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff's Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 54) on October 24, 2019.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
1. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED.
2. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27) is hereby GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Investigate Material Representation (ECF No. 53) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
