United States v. Worthy, 2:12-CR-135-DBH. (2020)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20200220c24
Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On January 15, 2020, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion. The petitioner filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on February 4, 2020. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated b
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On January 15, 2020, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion. The petitioner filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on February 4, 2020. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
On January 15, 2020, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion.
The petitioner filed an objection to the Recommended Decision on February 4, 2020. I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED. No certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases shall issue because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
