FONTECCHIO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 10-14762. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20120127j41
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on January 26, 2012 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court On August 29, 2011, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff Amy
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge. At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on January 26, 2012 PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court On August 29, 2011, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff Amy S..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GERALD E. ROSEN, Chief Judge.
At a session of said Court, held in the U.S. Courthouse, Detroit, Michigan on January 26, 2012
PRESENT: Honorable Gerald E. Rosen Chief Judge, United States District Court
On August 29, 2011, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R") recommending that the Court grant the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's motion for summary judgment and deny Plaintiff Amy S. Fontecchio's motion for summary judgment. No objections have been filed to the R & R. Upon reviewing the R & R, the parties' underlying cross-motions for summary judgment, and the record as a whole, the Court concurs in the analysis of the Magistrate Judge, and adopts the R & R in its entirety.
Accordingly,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's August 29, 2011 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, for the reasons stated in the R & R, Defendant's motion for summary judgment (docket #10) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (docket #9) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
