ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation (ECF No. 33) issued by Magistrate Judge Charles E. Binder on January 24, 2012, recommending the case be dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Judge Binder observes that Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on October 28, 2011. See ECF No. 32. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion, nor has he had any communication with the Court regarding this litigation since June 2011. Accordingly, Judge Binder recommends that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Rule 41(b), which authorizes the involuntary dismissal of a complaint "[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with . . . a court order."

As of today's date, no party has filed any objections to Judge Binder's report and recommendation. The failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the record. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Judge Binder's report and recommendation (ECF No. 33) is ADOPTED.

It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.