ARTHUR J. TARNOW, Senior District Judge.
ARTHUR J. TARNOW, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court are three motions filed by Curtis Jackson: 1) Motion to Be Produced As a Witness [143]; 2) Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus [144]; and 3) Motion to Strike [151]. Defendant Shrivell filed a Response [147] to Motions [143] and [144]. Jackson included a Reply to Shirvell's Response in his Motion [151]. Also before the Court is Jackson's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [145].
Jackson is not a party to the litigation. Jackson provides no authority that supports his request to be produced as a witness. Therefore, the Court will not order him to be produced.
Because the Court will not order Jackson to be produced as a witness as this time, there is no need for a writ of habeas corpus. Jackson's Motion for a Writ [144] is, therefore, moot.
Jackson argues that Shirvell's Response [147] should be stricken from the record because Jackson does not approve of the information included in the filing. Jackson, however, provides no authority to support such an action. Therefore, Jackson's Motion to Strike [151] is denied.
Finally, Jackson filed an Application [145] to proceed in forma pauperis in this litigation. Jackson is not a party to the litigation and is not bringing claims against Plaintiff or Defendant in this case. Therefore, there is no need for a waiver of filing fees or costs. The Application [145] is terminated as moot.
Accordingly,